avatar

Jacob Morrow

Updated: 2026-11-05

10 min read

AWS ended support for Amazon Pinpoint on October 30, 2026. According to the Amazon Pinpoint User Guide, that date closed access to endpoints (records that store device addresses and user attributes), segments, campaigns, journeys, and analytics. Not every team feels the change equally. If your applications only used direct SMS or push sending, those delivery services keep running.

If your marketers built journeys in the console, you need a new home for them. This guide compares Pinpoint alternative on feature coverage, daily operation, and maintenance effort. The core question: keep combining AWS services, or move to a customer engagement platform?

What Do You Need to Replace in Amazon Pinpoint?

The AWS end-of-support guide splits Pinpoint into two groups. Customer and device records, segments, campaigns, journeys, and analytics ended with the console. Direct sending for SMS, MMS, push, WhatsApp, and voice moved to AWS End User Messaging and continues to work. Existing customers can continue email sending; new email channels use SES, and AWS recommends a long-term move to SES.

That split matters because AWS Pinpoint meant different things to different teams. A team sending order confirmations directly can keep its delivery service, subject to the addressing changes below. A lifecycle marketer who ran win-back journeys needs audience segmentation, journey coordination, and campaign analytics back.

Function What AWS says Replacement needed?
User profiles and segmentation Saved customer and device records and segments no longer accessible Yes
Campaigns and journeys No longer accessible Yes
Analytics and performance reporting Dashboards and reporting access retired; delivery-event and metric feeds continue for direct sends Yes, for dashboards
SMS, voice, push, and one-time password sending Direct sending continues under AWS End User Messaging No, for continuing delivery services; sends relying on saved records need changes
Email sending Existing customers can continue sending; new email channels use SES No immediate switch required; AWS recommends long-term migration to SES
In-app messaging Not supported Yes

Developer note: Sending that depends on saved user or device records needs adjustment. AWS no longer supports SendUsersMessages or sending to stored endpoint IDs, even where direct channel sending continues.

Amazon Pinpoint Alternatives at a Glance

The AWS row is a bundle of three products, not one service.

Option Best for Main functions it can take over Extra setup or purchase Pricing basis
AWS combination Teams already on AWS Segments, journeys, email and SMS campaigns, direct sending Custom push setup; no in-app messaging in Connect; three products to configure Service and channel usage
EngageLab Journeys across push, email, SMS, WhatsApp Journeys, behavior triggers, analytics, five channels Channels opened separately; Marketing Automation priced on its own Unique users entering journeys each month (MEP); channels billed separately
Customer.io Lifecycle and product teams Event-driven workflows, segments, email, push, in-app, SMS SMS quoted; Premium for some integrations Profiles for people and objects such as companies or accounts; sending allowances
Braze Large cross-channel programs Canvas journeys, segmentation, most channels Quote-based edition, credits, services Monthly active users (MAUs), edition, Action Credits (credits for messaging and some features), and services
MoEngage Mobile-first teams Flows automation workflows, segments, push, email, SMS, in-app WhatsApp and RCS add-on; analytics add-ons Monthly tracked users (MTUs), plus channels and add-ons

5 Options to Consider After Amazon Pinpoint

1AWS In-House Option (Amazon Connect, SES, End User Messaging)

Best for: Teams already on AWS, or teams combining marketing journeys with high-volume service notifications.

pinpoint alternative aws

This route stays inside AWS by pairing three services. Amazon Connect outbound campaigns manage customer engagement, Amazon SES sends email, and AWS End User Messaging handles direct message delivery. You choose it for control and fit with your cloud setup, not for a single product experience.

AWS offers its own sorting rule. The migration guide says Connect outbound campaigns suit personalized engagement across voice, SMS, email, and WhatsApp, plus coordinated inbound and outbound work. End User Messaging with SES suits high-volume sending beyond Connect’s campaign limits when audience segmentation and coordinated campaigns are not needed. Teams with both requirements can combine these services.

Relevant capabilities:

  • Segments, templates, campaigns, and journeys through Connect outbound campaigns with Customer Profiles (AWS)
  • Email through Amazon SES, with Virtual Deliverability Manager covering the deliverability dashboard functionality Pinpoint had
  • SMS, push, and WhatsApp delivery through AWS End User Messaging

How your team would use it: Marketers build campaigns and journeys in Connect. Engineers move existing customer and device records into the new setup and handle customer-data integration, custom push setup, and ongoing maintenance.

Key trade-off: You rebuild what Pinpoint bundled. Connect lacks in-app messaging, and push requires custom setup within journeys rather than a built-in campaign step. Billing is usage-based: Connect charges by channel usage with no seat licensing, End User Messaging charges per message at rates that vary by country and carrier, and SES charges by email volume. Telephony, regional rates, and engineering hours affect the total.

2EngageLab

Best for: Operations teams that want one place to design journeys across push, web push, email, SMS, and WhatsApp.

pinpoint alternative engagelab

EngageLab Marketing Automation (MA) coordinates channel products in visual journeys. It fits cross-channel activation and re-engagement work: responding to behavior, controlling message frequency, and tracking conversion goals while marketers manage the journey.

Relevant capabilities:

  • Visual journey builder: Build onboarding and re-engagement journeys with drag-and-drop steps, wait times, and exit conditions.
  • Cross-channel messaging: Coordinate app push, web push, email, SMS, and WhatsApp within one journey.
  • Behavior-based targeting: Trigger messages based on customer actions and profile attributes, with frequency limits to control repeated contact.
  • Journey performance tracking: Track sends, deliveries, clicks, and conversion events to see how each journey performs.

How your team would use it: Developers connect product activity and customer data to the platform. For an activation journey, marketers target new users without a first purchase, send a push notification, wait a day, and email those who still have not purchased. A purchase exit condition stops follow-up, frequency limits reduce repeated contact, and conversion reporting shows progress toward the goal. This gives the team one workflow to refine instead of coordinating separate channel campaigns.

engagelab promotional campaign workflow

Key trade-off: MA is a separate product from the channels it sends through, so the required channels must be activated separately. MA bills by Monthly Engaged Persons, meaning unique users entering any journey in a month, while channels use their own models. SMS, WhatsApp, and MA pricing runs through sales.

Build your next activation journey with EngageLab

Coordinate multi-channel follow-ups, message frequency, and conversion tracking in one visual journey. Discuss your activation or re-engagement flow with our team.

Discuss My Journey

3Customer.io

Best for: Product and lifecycle teams that trigger messages from behavioral events.

pinpoint alternative customerio

Customer.io centers on event-driven lifecycle messaging across several channels, so message timing follows what customers actually do. It suits trial onboarding programs tied to product usage.

Relevant capabilities (per the Customer.io pricing page):

  • Visual workflow builder with cross-channel automation across email, in-app, push, and SMS
  • Segments with an AI-assisted builder
  • Send-time optimization and broadcasts started from your application
  • Native WhatsApp and LINE

How your team would use it: Developers connect product activity and customer data to the platform. Marketers build segments and workflows, then review campaign reporting and conversion tracking.

Key trade-off: Billing follows profiles for people and objects, such as company or account records. Essentials starts at $100 per month for 5,000 profiles, with $0.009 per extra profile, and Premium starts at $1,000 per month on annual billing. SMS volume is custom. The number of stored profiles and Premium-only features, such as data-warehouse connections and managed deliverability, determine the plan required.

4Braze

Best for: Large, complex cross-channel programs with several teams and audiences.

pinpoint alternative braze

Braze targets programs where several teams share one engagement platform and plan work through a sales-led contract. It suits teams that need to prioritize competing campaigns and manage team permissions.

Relevant capabilities (per the Braze pricing page, in every edition):

  • Campaigns and Canvas journeys with frequency limits
  • Cloud customer-data syncing
  • Email, push, SMS, RCS, WhatsApp, in-app messages, and content cards

How your team would use it: Marketing operations design Canvas journeys. Data teams keep customer information synced. Pro adds message prioritization, and higher editions add more journey controls and team permissions.

Key trade-off: Braze publishes no list prices and no free plan. Pricing scales with monthly active users (MAUs); the selected edition, Action Credits (credits used for messages and some features), and services also contribute to the contract. Braze defines a monthly active user as someone who records a session in a calendar month, and you choose whom to track. Message prioritization requires Pro, so the operating controls your team needs determine the edition.

5MoEngage

Best for: Mobile-first teams coordinating push, in-app, and web messages alongside email and SMS.

pinpoint alternative moengage

MoEngage leans toward mobile-first engagement across push, in-app, and web, with email and SMS alongside. It suits app retention programs that combine outbound reminders with in-app and on-site experiences.

Relevant capabilities (per the MoEngage plans page):

  • Push, web push, email, SMS, in-app, and on-site messages on Growth and Enterprise
  • Behavioral segments
  • Flows automation workflows with waits, conditional splits, and A/B branches
  • Best-time-to-send and preferred-channel intelligence on Enterprise

How your team would use it: Marketers assemble Flows automation workflows and campaigns. Developers connect product activity and customer data to the platform, and versioning lets teams revise live workflows.

Key trade-off: Billing uses Monthly Tracked Users, each unique profile with a session or defined event in a month, with a one-year minimum on Growth and Enterprise. WhatsApp, RCS, LINE, Viber, and Telegram come through a Connected Channels add-on, and several analytics modules are add-ons. A WhatsApp-led program therefore needs more than the base channel package.

Which Option Fits Your Team?

Stay with AWS when you already operate Amazon Connect and need coordinated inbound and outbound work. Push journeys require custom engineering setup, and Connect lacks in-app messaging.

EngageLab and Customer.io both fit behavior-triggered lifecycle messaging. EngageLab suits operations teams coordinating outreach across channels, message frequency, and conversion tracking in one visual journey. Customer.io is useful when product activity and relationships between people and company or account records shape lifecycle workflows. Braze suits teams that need message prioritization and team permission controls; MoEngage fits programs centered on in-app and on-site engagement.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is there a complete replacement for Amazon Pinpoint?

Several platforms cover Pinpoint’s core engagement features, but channel support and setup requirements differ. The right fit depends on the profiles, segments, journeys, reporting, and delivery services you used. In-app messaging and built-in push support are important differences between options.

Do I need to replace my AWS SMS and push APIs?

Usually not. AWS End User Messaging continues SMS, voice, mobile push, one-time passwords, and phone number validation. Pinpoint’s saved customer and device records, segments, campaigns, journeys, and analytics have retired. Sending methods that rely on those saved records need adjustment even where direct delivery continues.

What should I prepare before switching from Pinpoint?

Inventory customer data and attributes, message templates, segmentation rules, journey logic, and integrations. Include historical analytics you already exported, since Pinpoint’s reporting access has retired.

Conclusion

The best Pinpoint alternative covers the engagement functions you used and fits the team that will run them.

To evaluate EngageLab, contact the team with your current channels and one core activation or re-engagement journey to discuss entry rules, frequency limits, exit conditions, and conversion tracking.